skip navigation

of a
San Francisco Neighborhood

This Web site was funded by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans).

It was created by Anthropological Studies Center (ASC).

Excavating the Feature

The city block prior to excavationBeneath the parking lot asphalt of the city block at 540 Folsom, arhcaeologists find a dark, squarish smudge of organic soil. As dark soil can be formed by the decomposition of organic material, it is suspected that this is the top layer of a privy deposit. The feature is called "Privy 507". The top of Privy 507 is the dark square of soil

Hollow features such as privies can be filled by several processes: by their primary use, i.e. layers of excrement, by silts and sands from flooding or rain run-off, or by dumping objects such as household rubbish. These processes create layers, also known as contexts, that can be differentiated by their color, texture or density of artifacts. The sequence of layers within a feature is called its stratigraphy and it can reveal important information about how a features such as Privy 507 were created.

Although the top of Privy 507 was partially destroyed by the construction of Screening for artifactsa brick footing, its stratigraphy is undisturbed. The archaeologists set to work with trowels and buckets. As excavation of each of the contexts within Privy 507 is begun, the archaeologist assigns it a unique identifying number. The material from the contexts is piled into buckets, each tagged to keep the soil and artifacts of different contexts separate. The soil is screened through mesh with 1/4 inch-holes to recover the artifacts. Contexts thought to contain small seeds or fishbone are screened with 1/8 inch mesh. Artifacts found in each context are sent in labeled paper bags back to the lab for washing, reconstruction, and cataloging.

Not every archaeological feature is worth the time and expense of fully excavating and processing. Some features have been too Privy 507 being excavateddisturbed by animals, later buildings, or bottle collectors. Others contain very small numbers of artifacts, or cannot be associated by historical records with a known historic household or business.

How does the archaeologist decide in the field, under the pressure of time which archaeological features are valuable enough to excavate?

The mnemonic AIMS-R or “Association, Integrity, Materials, Stratigraphy and Relative Rarity” summarizes the criteria by which a feature is assessed. Can it be reliably associated with a historic household or business within an identified period of time? Does it have good stratigraphic definition? Is Archaeologist excavating privy 507it relatively undisturbed and its stratigraphy intact? Does it contain a good number and variety of artifacts, or does it represent a type of household, ethnic group, industrial process or time period for which very few other archaeological remains are known?

Privy 507 is a pretty easy call. Apart from the disturbance of the brick footing to its upper layers, the privy’s stratigraphy is intact. Judging from its artifacts, it dates to the early 1870s, a time period that is poorly represented amongst already-excavated archaeological deposits. Historical research suggested that it was created by the Peel family who occupied that parcel from 1856 to 1879.





Copyright ©2004 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved.